what we don't say on our about page


Flying the Coop: EMMA Technology Cooperative

"When you take infinite growth off the table, this entire world of possibilities opens up." — Ramsey Nassar, EMMA Technology Cooperative

We make this show to learn things, ask good questions, and let really cool people shine (and maybe occasionally get a little clever ourselves). This conversation did something different: it reminded us that what we're building isn't just a business model. It can be radical. And maybe it should be.

📖👀 Prefer reading? Full transcript and show notes live on our site.​
​


Here's something rather strange (this coming from a company with the word in their name!):

We are a worker-owned co-op, and we don't often talk about why.

The structural fact, sure. It's not a secret, it's on the website. We signed the bylaws, we share decisions, we pay each other equally, we say "co-op" in nearly every episode intro.

But the politics underneath the structure — the actual reason we built it this way — we keep that part piano piano.

This is partly because, uh, we want clients. Real ones, with budgets, including folks who don't necessarily 100000% share our politics but are doing work we big time believe in.

We can absolutely do meaningful work with people whose worldview doesn't match ours one-to-one. We've done it and we'll keep doing it.

But our actual stance on capitalism is closer to: burn it down.

And also: we're all trapped in this shitshow together, so how do we build things that support each other inside it?

Which is a slightly harder sell than "we'll help you make the big bucks."

This week's episode features Ramsey, Gwen, and Andy from EMMA Technology Cooperative. It stoked the radical fires already burning in our little hearts.

EMMA is a worker-owned co-op in New York that builds software and hardware for theme parks, theaters, video games, public installations. They are five years in, thriving, and completely unsentimental about why they organize this way.

Capitalism collapses all activity into a single verb: profit.​
Money turned into more money.
If you're breaking even, you're not doing the thing.

That's the system's only operation.

Not "people who do the work get paid."

Not "the organization keeps existing."

Not "we made something we love."

Just: money grew. 📈

If you can encode whatever you actually care about as profitable activity, the system will support it. Everything else is invisible to it.

video preview​

There's a small Venn diagram overlap between useful, interesting work and profitable work. Most of what we care deeply about lives in that little slice.

Being a co-op is one of the ways we get to intentionally operate in those coordinates. We can defer, delay, take a hit, choose quality over speed, and choose each other over growth.

In short, there are more verbs.

That's what EMMA has, that's what we have, that's what I want to be bolder about talking about.

(an aside that's very present for me as I write this: living in Spain has truly scrambled my American cultural upbringing. The US is weirdly insistent on politics and money as taboo topics. Spain is much more relaxed about all of it. People ask what you paid for your house. People talk about politics at dinner. It was unnerving for me as a recent transplant but I've grown to embrace it. It's good for the collective to share where we're at freely!)

video preview​

Ramsey, Gwen, and Andy are warm and geeky and brave. They make me want to be a little more of all three.

The episode is live now wherever you listen (except Spotify, and here’s why that’s intentional). It's one of my favorites we've made.

💡 What have you trained yourself not to say in a professional context? What's it costing you?

💡 If your work only had access to one verb — one way to measure whether it's working — what would you want it to be? And how far is is from the verb the system is actually using?

Hit reply. We read everything, always.

Petons!

Janel (she/they)

🏳️‍⚧️✊🏳️‍🌈✊🇵🇸

P.S. We don't have an About page.


📣 Flying the Coop episode calendar

Strange Birds

💌Sign up for Tuesday emails 💌 ✔️ business insights inspired by how moss grows ✔️lessons pulled from fantastical stories about magic in space ✔️metaphors that connect ultimate frisbee to being a business owner

Read more from Strange Birds

Part five: conclusion Y’all ready for the final installment of marketing funnels are silly? I am! This one has been fun to write. I do apologize for it coming out with long breaks between installments. Life got in the way, but that happens! And ironically, something a lot of funnel tactics don’t account for. (I’m looking at you, countdown timers) What we’ve learned so far: Balancing company- and customer-centered needs when you make sales and marketing decisions is critically important...

Part four: creating a system that works for you Cool. So. So! So far in this series, you have seen the light about marketing funnels. They are nice and pretty BUT they are a failed attempt to simplify something deeply complex. They force organizations to make company-centered instead of customer-centered decisions. They create tunnel vision, causing people to miss or flat-out ignore signals customers are sending that say WE WANT THIS. All of this is because humans are chaotic. Your job in all...

Part three: why the chaotic nature of being a human makes everything really hard The topic of today’s installment of marketing funnels are silly series: HOOOMANS ARE CHAOS MACHINES In the first installment, I broke down why marketing funnels encourage company-centered decisions instead of customer-centered ones. The second one, I showed y’all how marketing funnels create tunnel vision, leaving companies sans happy customers and/or fewer customers overall. The thesis throughout this series is...